I know this is a very old question, but I have never explicitly seen a satisfactory solution to this question other than the obvious, and most likely correct, answer to re-structure your code. Unfortunately, it is not always practical to do such a thing, in which case as a very last resort, it is possible … Read more
Java 8 introduces lambdas. java.util.function.BiConsumer<Integer, Integer> times = (i, num) -> { i *= num; System.out.println(i); }; for (int i = 1; i < 100; i++) { times.accept(i, 2); //multiply i by 2 and print i times.accept(i, i); //square i and then print the result } The () -> syntax works on any interface that … Read more
Here is how you would do this with a nested list comprehension: [[float(y) for y in x] for x in l] This would give you a list of lists, similar to what you started with except with floats instead of strings. If you want one flat list, then you would use [float(y) for x in … Read more
Since the implementation (not only the interface) must not block, I like your list idea. Set up a list of “operations” (perhaps Futures?), for which the setup should be pretty clear and readable. Then upon receiving each response, the next operation should be invoked. With a little imagination, this sounds like the chain of responsibility. … Read more
If you know the number of levels in nested arrays you can simply do nested loops. Like so: // Scan through outer loop foreach ($tmpArray as $innerArray) { // Check type if (is_array($innerArray)){ // Scan through inner loop foreach ($innerArray as $value) { echo $value; } }else{ // one, two, three echo $innerArray; } } … Read more
You can use post_init for this from dataclasses import dataclass @dataclass class One: f_one: int f_two: str @dataclass class Two: f_three: str f_four: One def __post_init__(self): self.f_four = One(**self.f_four) data = {‘f_three’: ‘three’, ‘f_four’: {‘f_one’: 1, ‘f_two’: ‘two’}} print(Two(**data)) # Two(f_three=”three”, f_four=One(f_one=1, f_two=’two’))
There are a lot of answers here. And it’s old, but this is for anyone coming here via google. In jQuery each function return false; is like break. just return; is like continue These will emulate the behavior of break and continue.
As far as I know, defining a named function within a function does not give you access to any local variables. What you can do instead is use a Proc: def foo(x) bar = lambda do puts x end bar.call 42 end foo(5)
If you load in the entire json as a dict (or list) e.g. using json.load, you can use json_normalize: In [11]: d = {“response”: {“body”: {“contact”: {“email”: “mr@abc.com”, “mobile_number”: “0123456789”}, “personal”: {“last_name”: “Muster”, “gender”: “m”, “first_name”: “Max”, “dob”: “1985-12-23”, “family_status”: “single”, “title”: “Dr.”}, “customer”: {“verified”: “true”, “customer_id”: “1234567”}}, “token”: “dsfgf”, “version”: “1.1”}} In [12]: df … Read more
max(alkaline_earth_values, key=lambda x: x[1]) The reason this works is because the key argument of the max function specifies a function that is called when max wants to know the value by which the maximum element will be searched. max will call that function for each element in the sequence. And lambda x: x[1] creates a … Read more