You can use answers: val otm: ObjectToMock = mockk() every { otm.methodToCall(any(), any())} answers { secondArg<(String) -> Unit>().invoke(“anything”) } otm.methodToCall(“bla”){ println(“invoked with $it”) //invoked with anything } Within the answers scope you can access firstArg, secondArg etc and get it in the expected type by providing it as a generic argument. Note that I explicitly … Read more
Since r69 of OCMock, it’s possible to reject a method call http://svn.mulle-kybernetik.com/OCMock/trunk/Source/Changes.txt Nice mocks / failing fast When a method is called on a mock object that has not been set up with either expect or stub the mock object will raise an exception. This fail-fast mode can be turned off by creating a “nice” … Read more
I was able to solve it using ConfigurationBuilder. Hope this will help var appSettings = @”{“”AppSettings””:{ “”Key1″” : “”Value1″”, “”Key2″” : “”Value2″”, “”Key3″” : “”Value3″” }}”; var builder = new ConfigurationBuilder(); builder.AddJsonStream(new MemoryStream(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(appSettings))); var configuration= builder.Build();
Why use unit testing when you can have Automated Specification-Based Testing? The QuickCheck library does this for you. It can generate arbitrary (mock) functions and data using the Arbitrary type-class. “Dependency Injection” is a degenerate form of implicit parameter passing. In Haskell, you can use Reader, or Free to achieve the same thing in a … Read more
Creating a complex mocking infrastructure will probably just hide the problems in your code. I would recommend that you start with integration tests, with a test database, around the areas of the code base that you plan to change. Once you have enough tests to ensure that you won’t break anything if you make a … Read more
How to mock a dictionary in Python is a good/direct question someone else can search, so: I suggest MagicMock instead of Mock Overload the __getitem__ from unittest.mock import MagicMock m = MagicMock() d = {‘key_1’: ‘value’} m.__getitem__.side_effect = d.__getitem__ # dict behaviour m[‘key_1’] # => ‘value’ m[‘key_2’] # => raise KeyError # mock behaviour m.foo(42) … Read more
I have found the answer, if someone is looking for it: import { NavigationEnd } from ‘@angular/router’; import { Observable } from ‘rxjs/Observable’; class MockRouter { public ne = new NavigationEnd(0, ‘http://localhost:4200/login’, ‘http://localhost:4200/login’); public events = new Observable(observer => { observer.next(this.ne); observer.complete(); }); } class MockRouterNoLogin { public ne = new NavigationEnd(0, ‘http://localhost:4200/dashboard’, ‘http://localhost:4200/dashboard’); public … Read more
from jasmine example, jasmine.clock().install(); var baseTime = new Date(2013, 9, 23); jasmine.clock().mockDate(baseTime); jasmine.clock().tick(50) expect(new Date().getTime()).toEqual(baseTime.getTime() + 50); afterEach(function () { jasmine.clock().uninstall(); }); jasmine date
If the SaveItem() method is virtual or abstract, and you’re not setting Callbase = true, then the method should be re-implemented to do nothing by the mock. You should be able to do: mockDb.Setup(d => d.SaveItem(It.IsAny<object>())).Verifiable(); … test here … mockDb.Verify();
O.K, I got my mistake!!! I’ve used the @InjectMocks but initialized the same variable in the init() method… So what happened was that mockito injected the mock objects to my variable – but seconds later I ran it over – initializing that very same variable!!!