Briefly: Unit testing – You unit test each individual piece of code. Think each file or class. Integration testing – When putting several units together that interact you need to conduct Integration testing to make sure that integrating these units together has not introduced any errors. Regression testing – after integrating (and maybe fixing) you … Read more
WPF MVVM Unit Tests for the ViewModel? [closed]
What you try to achieve will not work. The problem is that powermock must rewrite the client class’s code to intercept the static invocation and it can’t do this after the class is loaded. Thus it can only prepare a class for test before it is loaded. Let’s assume you want to mock the System.currentTimeMillis … Read more
Like you said, it fails because the arguments are different. Take a look at the test below and you’ll see that the second test method will fail because the status in your MyClass instance is different from SomeStatus that you passed in the matcher. public class MatcherTest { class MyClass{ private String status; MyClass(String status) … Read more
should and must are the same semantically. But it’s not about better documentation, it’s basically just down to personal stylistic preference (I prefer must for example). can is a little different. You can’t (nomen omen) use it directly as a matcher, it’s only available in a test descriptor. Quote from FlatSpec: Note: you can use … Read more
ShreyasRmsft commented the following on GitHub: Hi @cactuaroid DataTestMethod is not needed. Go ahead and use TestMethod with DataRows to data drive your tests. For any more doubts follow the official docs at https://github.com/microsoft/testfx-docs https://github.com/microsoft/testfx/issues/614 https://github.com/microsoft/testfx-docs/issues/64 So, according to Microsoft, it is preferred to use TestMethod over DataTestMethod.