This is not currently supported in Cypress. I built a workaround that might help, though. I set up a simple server that runs in parallel to cypress. The endpoint opens a headless instance of Puppeteer and completes the login flow, responding to the call with all the cookies: const micro = require(“micro”); const puppeteer = … Read more
In previous version of Google Mock you can only mock virtual functions, see the documentation in the project’s page. More recent versions allowed to mock non-virtual methods, using what they call hi-perf dependency injection. As user @congusbongus states in the comment below this answer: Google Mock relies on adding member variables to support method mocking, … Read more
As noted in another answer, if you don’t care about the order, you might do best to change the interface so it doesn’t care about the order. If order matters in the code but not in a specific test, you can use the ArgumentCaptor as you did. It clutters the code a bit. If this … Read more
Use patch.object as a decorator or context manager, as in the following code: >>> class EmailChecker(): … def is_email_correct(self, email): … pass … >>> def my_side_effect(*args): … if args[0] == ‘1’: … return True … else: … return False … >>> with mock.patch.object(EmailChecker, ‘is_email_correct’, side_effect=my_side_effect): … checker = EmailChecker() … print(checker.is_email_correct(‘1’)) … print(checker.is_email_correct(‘2’)) … True … Read more
Just use @patch() to mock out get_complex_data_structure(): @patch(‘module_under_test.get_complex_data_structure’) def test_function_to_test(self, mocked_function): foo_mock = mocked_function.return_value When the test function then calls get_complex_data_structure() a mock object is returned and stored in the local name foo; the very same object that mocked_function.return_value references in the above test; you can use that value to test if do_work() got passed … Read more
The answer: Clean up your darned imports @patch(‘mymodule.TAX_LOCATION’, ”) did indeed patch things appropriately, but since our imports at the time were very haphazard — sometimes we imported mymodule.build_cart, sometimes we imported project.mymodule.build_cart — instances of the “full” import were not patched at all. Mock couldn’t be expected to know about the two separate import … Read more
There is no need to provide a separate constructor. Mocking patches your code to replace objects with mocks. Just use the mock.patch() decorator on your test methods; it’ll pass in references to the generated mock objects. Both producer.Producer() and consumer.Consumer() are then mocked out before you create the instance: import mock class MyTest(unittest.TestCase): @mock.patch(‘producer.Producer’, autospec=True) … Read more
After reading the link you provided I noticed that we can also provide an mjpeg. Depending on what your test requirements – this may be sufficient for you. As a terminal command with ffmpeg installed: ffmpeg -i oldfile.mp4 newfile.mjpeg then I tested by running Google Chrome from the terminal using: google-chrome –use-fake-device-for-media-stream –use-file-for-fake-video-capture=newfile.mjpeg After navigating … Read more
It’s because of @Component({ providers: [FundingPlanService] <=== }) The @Component.providers takes precedence over any global providers, since using the @Component.providers makes the provider scoped only to the component. In the test, Angular creates the mocked service in the module scope and the original service in the component scope. To solve this problem, Angular provides the … Read more
The alternative is to use the @Mock annotation since then Mockito can use type reflection to find the generic type: public class MyTest { @Mock private ArrayList<String> mockArrayList; … public void setUp() { MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this); } public void testMyTest() { when(mockArrayList.get(0)).thenReturn(“Hello world”); String result = mockArrayList.get(0); assertEquals(“Should have the correct string”, “Hello world”, result); verify(mockArrayList).get(0); } … Read more