Not according to the spec: Some elements, not all of them form-associated, are categorized as labelable elements. These are elements that can be associated with a label element. “button” “input” (if the type attribute is not in the hidden state) “keygen” “meter” “output” “progress” “select” “textarea” http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/forms.html#category-label See also: The for attribute may be specified … Read more
As of Nuget 2.8 you can add the following attribute to your nuget.config <configuration> <config> <add key=”dependencyversion” value=”Highest” /> </config> </configuration> When resolving your packages, the latest version of that package will be resolved. Other attributes include HighestMinor, HighestPatch and lowest (based on semantic versioning) Source: http://docs.nuget.org/docs/release-notes/nuget-2.8
“Normative” means that it’s an official formal part of the specification; non-normative means that it’s there to be helpful and aid understanding, but you can’t appeal to it in a court of law (so to speak). I’m afraid that specifications from standard bodies like W3C, just like legal contracts, are written in formal language that … Read more
Is it enough that I define my specification as follows: JMA must provide a method that adds two integers? That’s a specification. It’s not a very useful one, because it doesn’t give many guarantees to the user of an implementation of that specification. If I wanted to write a program that adds two integers, I … Read more
They have one so that the pNext field actually works. Yes, the API takes a struct with a proper C type, so both the caller and the receiver agree on what type that struct is. But especially nowadays, many such structs have linked lists of structures that provide additional information to the implementation. These extension … Read more
Basically, it’s a broken interface. Ken Arnold and Bill Venners discussed it in Java Design Issues. Arnold: If I were to be God at this point, and many people are probably glad I am not, I would say deprecate Cloneable and have a Copyable, because Cloneable has problems. Besides the fact that it’s misspelled, Cloneable … Read more
There is an official SQL standard from the ISO/ANSI committee. Some information can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sql However the specification itself is not freely available. You might find some drafts of older specs in the internet if you search for it. A nice explanation of the (yet a bit old) ANSI 99 standard is here: … Read more
You are correct: there is no need to include the (noise of) “boilerplate” signatures of standard setters and getters in a class model. Unfortunately, UML does not define a standard notation for implying getters and setters for private attributes. So, you’d have to use your own convention. For instance, you could include a general explanation … Read more
So What is the difference between the terms “thenable” and “promise”? I think the section you’ve already cited does answer this very well: A thenable is an object with a then method. Any object. A promise is an object with a then method (i.e. a thenable) that conforms to the specification. So far so simple. … Read more
There isn’t an official standard. In practice, in its simplest form, an mjpeg is just a concatenation of jpeg files, one after the other in the same file. ffmpeg supports this using the -f mjpeg or -vcodec mjpeg switches. JPEG decoders that decode multiple images should remember and use the same jpeg tables for subsequent … Read more