If you only need to do that, you should look at ExpandoObject. If you need to do that and still use DynamicObject, you will need to write code to remember property values, basically… which you could potentially do with an embedded ExpandoObject. It’s not clear to me what you want to do with this object … Read more
I also came across these kinds of requirements recently. I set the below properties without writing the code and it works. See if this helps you.
Object: Each object in C# is derived from object type, either directly or indirectly. It is compile time variable and require boxing and unboxing for conversion and it makes it slow. You can change value type to reference type and vice versa. public void CheckObject() { object test = 10; test = test + 10; … Read more
When you pass the dynamic to CreateCommand, the compiler is treating its return type as a dynamic that it has to resolve at runtime. Unfortunately, you’re hitting some oddities between that resolver and the C# language. Fortunately, it’s easy to work around by removing your use of var forcing the compiler to do what you … Read more
You have this error in your output: Missing compiler required member ‘Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.CSharpArgumentInfo.Create’ You need to add a reference to the DLL Microsoft.CSharp.dll.
Yes, you can absolutely do that. For the purposes of static overload resolution, it’s treated as an object parameter (and called statically). What you do within the method will then be dynamic. For example: using System; class Program { static void Foo(dynamic duck) { duck.Quack(); // Called dynamically } static void Foo(Guid ignored) { } … Read more
Update For 2023: Our answer to this question is quite old, and as of today, for large Enterprise applications, we prefer to do Webpack 5 module federation (which manages the singleton React + ReactDOM + others intrinsically). Although module federation is very new, we are using it in large enterprise applications and it seems to … Read more
Here is the answer! The Dynamic Linq does support the . operator, According to the docs: “Instance field or instance property access. Any public field or property can be accessed.” Thus, it is possible to use this syntax .Where(“MyColumn.Contains(@0)”, myArray) Thanks for all the suggestions! And thanks to me for finding the solution.
Just use dynamic as the argument: var list = new List<dynamic>();
jQuery is not available immediately as you are loading it asynchronously (by appending it to the <head>). You would have to add an onload listener to the script (jqTag) to detect when it loads and then run your code. e.g. function myJQueryCode() { //Do stuff with jQuery } if(typeof jQuery==’undefined’) { var headTag = document.getElementsByTagName(“head”)[0]; … Read more