Is there an equivalent of Pythons range(12) in C#?
You’re looking for the Enumerable.Range method: var mySequence = Enumerable.Range(0, 12);
You’re looking for the Enumerable.Range method: var mySequence = Enumerable.Range(0, 12);
plt.hist(hmag, 30, range=[6.5, 12.5], facecolor=”gray”, align=’mid’)
Some performance measurements, using timeit instead of trying to do it manually with time. First, Apple 2.7.2 64-bit: In [37]: %timeit collections.deque((x for x in xrange(10000000) if x%4 == 0), maxlen=0) 1 loops, best of 3: 1.05 s per loop Now, python.org 3.3.0 64-bit: In [83]: %timeit collections.deque((x for x in range(10000000) if x%4 == … Read more
You are trying to run a Python 2 codebase with Python 3. xrange() was renamed to range() in Python 3. Run the game with Python 2 instead. Don’t try to port it unless you know what you are doing, most likely there will be more problems beyond xrange() vs. range(). For the record, what you … Read more
For performance, especially when you’re iterating over a large range, xrange() is usually better. However, there are still a few cases why you might prefer range(): In python 3, range() does what xrange() used to do and xrange() does not exist. If you want to write code that will run on both Python 2 and … Read more
In Python 2.x: range creates a list, so if you do range(1, 10000000) it creates a list in memory with 9999999 elements. xrange is a sequence object that evaluates lazily. In Python 3: range does the equivalent of Python 2’s xrange. To get the list, you have to explicitly use list(range(…)). xrange no longer exists.