Try /// Has a close relation to the <see cref=”Get(string)”/> /// and <see cref=”Get(int)” /> methods. You may need full typenames but intellisense should help as soon as you put first bracket in. Hope that helps, Dan
There is no in-built solution for this in JavaScript. An alternative solution can be using the arguments object (in some cases), or passing your own configuration options, similar to this: const defaults = { numberWheels: 4, color: “black”, name: “myCar” } class Car { constructor(options) { this.wheelsNum = options.numberWheels || defaults.numberWheels; this.name = options.name || … Read more
In addition to non-C++20 answer, if you are, by any chance, able to use C++20 and its concepts feature, I would suggest you the following implementation: #include <iostream> #include <concepts> enum class MyEnum { A, B, C }; template <typename T> concept IntegralOrEnum = std::same_as<MyEnum, T> || std::integral<T>; template <IntegralOrEnum T> bool isFunction(T const& aVariable) … Read more
I’m doing the same thing and noticed a nugget in the Django docs that you should think about. Overriding predefined model methods Overriding Delete Note that the delete() method for an object is not necessarily called when deleting objects in bulk using a QuerySet. To ensure customized delete logic gets executed, you can use pre_delete … Read more
Your 1st case is pretty straight-forward. The below method: public MyContainer<IntWrapper> pack(int key, Object[] values) is an exact match for arguments – (1, String[]). From JLS Section 15.12.2: The first phase (ยง15.12.2.2) performs overload resolution without permitting boxing or unboxing conversion Now, there is no boxing involved while passing those parameters to the 2nd method. … Read more
The intent seems to be to differenciate between invocations with temporaries (i.e. 9) and ‘regular’ argument passing. The first case may allow the function implementation to employ optimizations since it is clear that the arguments will be disposed afterwards (which is absolutely senseless for integer literals, but may make sense for user-defined objects). However, the … Read more
can you please explain the first line last false output, why it is not true? The compile-time type of ab is A, so the compiler – which is what performs overload resolution – determines that the only valid method signature is f(A a), so it calls that. At execution time, that method signature is executed … Read more
AppInit_DLLs. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/197571 But see also: AppInit_DLLs should be renamed Deadlock_Or_Crash_Randomly_DLLs AppInit_DLLs should be renamed Deadlock_Or_Crash_Randomly_DLLs You may also want to look into “DLL Injection”. Four approaches (including AppInint_DLLs) are described here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLL_Injection
Of that list only the second introduces ambiguity, because functions – regardless of whether they are templates – can’t be overloaded based on return type. You can use the other two: template<typename X> void func(X x, int y); will be used if the second argument of the call is an int, e.g func(“string”, 10); template<class … Read more
The literal 0 has two meanings in C++. On the one hand, it is an integer with the value 0. On the other hand, it is a null-pointer constant. As your setval function can accept either an int or a char*, the compiler can not decide which overload you meant. The easiest solution is to … Read more