The only thing that Python cares about is that the name is defined when it is actually looked up. That’s all. In your case, this is just fine, order doesn’t really matter since you are just defining two functions. That is, you are just introducing two new names, no look-ups. Now, if you called one … Read more
This will work. @Test(priority=1) public void Test1() { } @Test(priority=2) public void Test2() { } @Test(priority=3) public void Test3() { } priority encourages execution order but does not guarantee the previous priority level has completed. test3 could start before test2 completes. If a guarantee is needed, then declare a dependency. Unlike the solutions which declare … Read more
Actually, if you read the error message properly, case 1 and case 2 throw different errors. Case a.x.y: Cannot set property ‘y’ of undefined Case a.x.y.z: Cannot read property ‘y’ of undefined I guess it’s best to describe it by step-by-step execution in easy English. Case 1 // 1. Declare variable `a` // 2. Define … Read more
You can indeed not define the filter execution order using @WebFilter annotation. However, to minimize the web.xml usage, it’s sufficient to annotate all filters with just a filterName so that you don’t need the <filter> definition, but just a <filter-mapping> definition in the desired order. For example, @WebFilter(filterName=”filter1″) public class Filter1 implements Filter {} @WebFilter(filterName=”filter2″) … Read more