Difference between numpy.logical_and and &

@user1121588 answered most of this in a comment, but to answer fully… “Bitwise and” (&) behaves much the same as logical_and on boolean arrays, but it doesn’t convey the intent as well as using logical_and, and raises the possibility of getting misleading answers in non-trivial cases (packed or sparse arrays, maybe). To use logical_and on … Read more

How to test string and integer equality, and combine with logical && and || operators in bash?

What you’ve written actually almost works (it would work if all the variables were numbers), but it’s not an idiomatic way at all. (…) parentheses indicate a subshell. What’s inside them isn’t an expression like in many other languages. It’s a list of commands (just like outside parentheses). These commands are executed in a separate … Read more

Why does non-equality check of one variable against many values always return true?

Use &&/AND/and, not ||/OR/or: v != “x” && v != “y” && v != “z” Problem If an if block is always executed, the condition for the if block always evaluates to true. The logical expression must be wrong. Let us consider v != “x” || v != “y” || v != “z” for each … Read more

Logical AND, OR: Is left-to-right evaluation guaranteed? [duplicate]

Yes, it’s guaranteed, otherwise such operators would lose much of their usefulness. Important notice: this is valid only for the builtin && and ||; if some criminal overloads them, they are treated as “regular” overloaded binary operators, so in this case both operands are always evaluated, and in unspecified order as usual. For this reason, … Read more

tech