You cannot use assignments in a expression, and a lambda only takes an expression. You can store lambdas in dictionaries just fine otherwise: dict = {‘Applied_poison_rating_bonus’ : (lambda target, magnitude: target.equipmentPoisonRatingBonus + magnitude)} The above lambda of course only returns the result, it won’t alter target.equimentPoisonRatingBonus in-place.
Note that Application.Resources requires an instance of ResourceDictionary, so you have to do something like this: <Application.Resources> <ResourceDictionary> <vm:ViewModelLocator x:Key=”Locator” xmlns:vm=”using:Scedule.ViewModel” /> <ResourceDictionary.MergedDictionaries> <ResourceDictionary Source=”Resource Dictionaries/StandardStyles.xaml”/> </ResourceDictionary.MergedDictionaries> </ResourceDictionary> </Application.Resources> So it’s not strange at all, it’s also not a bug. If you want your ResourceDictionary to be treated as a resource, you of course have … Read more
Answer for Python 3.6+ Guido has assured dictionaries would be ordered from Python 3.7 onwards, and they already were as an experimental feature in 3.6. The answer has already been expanded on in Fastest way to sort a python 3.7+ dictionary. In this case, building a new dict with simple dictionary comprehension based on the … Read more
I am having a similar issue as OP (using dart-sass v1.25.0), and only map-get works, map.get doesn’t. The documentation doesn’t seem to be very clear on this, but the (Sass Module System: Draft 6) document on Github explains it better. It seems like Sass is moving on to using @use in favour of @import for … Read more
Use: gw_func_dict = dict((chr(2**i), func) for i, func in enumerate(gwfuncs[:8])) That’s the dict() function with a generator expression producing (key, value) pairs. Or, to put it generically, a dict comprehension of the form: {key_expr: value_expr for targets in iterable <additional loops or if expressions>} can always be made compatible with Python < 2.7 by using: … Read more
Your map is not supposed to be accessed that way, it’s indexed by keys not by positions. A map iterator is bidirectional, just like a list, so the function you are using is no more inefficient than accessing a list by position. If you want random access by position then use a vector or a … Read more
This would work, although I didn’t test edge-cases: >>> d = {‘key1’: 1, ‘key2’: 2, ‘key3’: 3, ‘key4’: 4, ‘key5’: 5} >>> d1 = dict(d.items()[len(d)/2:]) >>> d2 = dict(d.items()[:len(d)/2]) >>> print d1 {‘key1’: 1, ‘key5’: 5, ‘key4’: 4} >>> print d2 {‘key3’: 3, ‘key2’: 2} In python3: d = {‘key1’: 1, ‘key2’: 2, ‘key3’: 3, … Read more
This error is fairly self-explanatory. Dictionary keys are unique and you cannot have more than one of the same key. To fix this, you should modify your code like so: Dictionary<string, string> rct3Features = new Dictionary<string, string>(); Dictionary<string, string> rct4Features = new Dictionary<string, string>(); foreach (string line in rct3Lines) { string[] items = line.Split(new String[] … Read more
if (‘X’ in mmap) { // … } Here is an example on JSFiddle. hasOwnProperty is also valid, but using in is much more painless. The only difference is that in returns prototype properties, whereas hasOwnProperty does not.
You can always pass a dictionary as an argument to a function. For instance, dict = {‘a’:1, ‘b’:2} def myFunc(a=0, b=0, c=0): print(a,b,c) myFunc(**dict)