Yes, the solution by @JCorcuera is applicable, but I suggest applying a little more information to Rails to fulfill our requirement. Try this approach: rails generate migration add_columnname_to_tablename columnname:datatype For example: rails generate migration add_password_to_users password:string
Property binding like [trueValue]=”…” evaluates the expression “…” and assigns the value “true” evaluates to the value true “Y” is unknown. There is no internal Y value in TypeScript and no property in the component class instance, which is the scope of template binding. In this case you would want [trueValue]=”‘Y'” Note the additional quotes … Read more
You can’t do this totally via generic constraints, but you can do a couple things to help: 1) Put the new() constraint on the generic type (to enable the ability to deserialize and to ensure the XmlSerializer doesn’t complain about a lack of default ctor): where T : new() 2) On the first line of … Read more
There are some things about the autoassign code that bug me (mostly stylistic, but one more serious problem): autoassign does not assign an ‘args’ attribute: class Foo(object): @autoassign def __init__(self,a,b,c=False,*args): pass a=Foo(‘IBM’,’/tmp’,True, 100, 101) print(a.args) # AttributeError: ‘Foo’ object has no attribute ‘args’ autoassign acts like a decorator. But autoassign(*argnames) calls a function which returns … Read more
The reason for this error is that .get() returns an individual object and .update() only works on querysets, such as what would be returned with .filter() instead of .get(). If you are using .get(), then .update() will not work. You will need to save the information to the object manually: archivo = archivo.objects.get(archivo_id=procesar) archivo.archivo_registros = … Read more
It’s saying that the attributes that make up the embedded id may have predefined (through explicit or implicit mappings) column names. By using the @AttributeOverride you’re saying “ignore what other information you have with regard to what column it is stored in, and use the one I specify here”.
Use if( $(“#test”).css(‘display’) == ‘block’) { I’m fairly sure .css(), returning a calculated value, will always return a lower case result – the docs say nothing on this. To make totally sure, you could do a if( $(“#test”).css(‘display’).toLowerCase() == ‘block’) { while you can rely on display giving reliable results, note that some CSS properties … Read more
I don’t think there is built in attribute for ajax, but you can create your own AjaxOnly filter like this: public class AjaxOnlyAttribute : ActionMethodSelectorAttribute { public override bool IsValidForRequest(ControllerContext controllerContext, System.Reflection.MethodInfo methodInfo) { return controllerContext.RequestContext.HttpContext.Request.IsAjaxRequest(); } } And decorate your action methods like this: [AjaxOnly] public ActionResult AjaxMethod() { } See Also: ASP.NET MVC … Read more
You’re actually creating what is called an anonymous type here, not a dynamic one. Unfortunately no there is no way to achieve what you are trying to do. Anonymous types are meant to be a very simple immutable type consisting of name / value pairs. The C# version of anonymous type only allows you to … Read more
Imagine the following: [HttpGet] public ActionResult Edit(int id) { … } [HttpPost] public ActionResult Edit(MyEditViewModel myEditViewModel) { … } This wouldn’t be possible unless the ActionMethodSelectorAttributes HttpGet and HttpPost where used. This makes it really simple to create an edit view. All the action links just points right back to the controller. If the view … Read more