Why aren’t exceptions in C++ checked by the compiler?

What’s funny is that Java has checked exceptions, and Java programmers hate those too.

Exception specifications in C++ are useless for 3 reasons:

1. C++ exception specifications inhibit optimization.

With the exception possibly of throw(), compilers insert extra code to check that when you throw an exception, it matches the exception specification of functions during a stack unwind. Way to make your program slower.

2. C++ exception specifications are not compiler-enforced

As far as your compiler is concerned, the following is syntactically correct:

void AStupidFunction() throw()
{
    throw 42;
}

What’s worse, nothing useful happens if you violate an exception specification. Your program just terminates!

3. C++ exception specifications are part of a function’s signature.

If you have a base class with a virtual function and try to override it, the exception specifications must match exactly. So, you’d better plan ahead, and it’s still a pain.

struct A
{
    virtual int value() const throw() {return 10;}
}

struct B : public A
{
    virtual int value() const {return functionThatCanThrow();} // ERROR!
}

Exception specifications give you these problems, and the gain for using them is minimal. In contrast, if you avoid exception specifications altogether, coding is easier and you avoid this stuff.