IMHO, you shouldn’t create package’s depending on your views. My approach towards such applications A package for corresponding controllers of these views Different packages for service(business) and dao(persistence) layer, if exists A directory for resources such as images, css etc A directory for FXML files called view in the resources src/main ├──java ├── controllers ├──Screen1controller.java … Read more
I also wish Xcode automatically kept itself and the file system in sync. So much so, that I spent an hour doing so manually for a project called acani-iphone on GitHub. Basically, I just moved some of the files around using Finder, creating new folders as I pleased. Then, I switched back to Xcode and … Read more
I try to keep things very simple whenever I can, so usually something like this works for me: Myapp.Domain – All domain specific classes share this namespace Myapp.Data – Thin layer that abstracts the database from the domain. Myapp.Application – All “support code”, logging, shared utility code, service consumers etc Myapp.Web – The web UI … Read more
Good question – i don’t have a concrete answer for you but I recommend checking out this post – http://blog.codeclimate.com/blog/2012/02/07/what-code-goes-in-the-lib-directory/ – be sure to read through all the comments on a current project i have a ton of non-ActiveRecord objects under app/models, it works but not ideal i put ‘re-useable’ non application specific code under … Read more
Some general guidelines: Pair up your interfaces with implementations. If you have foo.cxx, everything defined in there had better be declared in foo.h. Ensure that every header file #includes all other necessary headers or forward-declarations necessary for independent compilation. Resist the temptation to create an “everything” header. They’re always trouble down the road. Put a … Read more
I recently worked on a Backbone project called GapVis (code here, rendered content here). I don’t know if it’s “really large”, but it’s big-ish and relatively complex – 24 view classes, 5 routers, etc. It might be worth taking a look, though I don’t know that all my approaches will be relevant. You can see … Read more
While Resharper has many cool features it has a large impact in CPU and I/O usage and can be very complicated to use. It is also only available under commercial licensing unless you qualify for a few very specific free use licenses. Try CodeMaid. It is free for commercial use and has a much lower … Read more