Since all the other answers are blah blah blah, here’s a short answer: import com.google.api.client.http.javanet.NetHttpTransport; import com.google.api.client.json.gson.GsonFactory; GoogleIdTokenVerifier verifier = new GoogleIdTokenVerifier.Builder(new NetHttpTransport(), new GsonFactory());
Try the following code : $username=”ABC”; $password=’XYZ’; $URL='<URL>’; $ch = curl_init(); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL,$URL); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_TIMEOUT, 30); //timeout after 30 seconds curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER,1); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_HTTPAUTH, CURLAUTH_ANY); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_USERPWD, “$username:$password”); $result=curl_exec ($ch); $status_code = curl_getinfo($ch, CURLINFO_HTTP_CODE); //get status code curl_close ($ch);
Your first question: Is the extra overhead on each request by sending the permissions to the server worth avoiding the hassle of looking up the permissions upon each request? Answer: Let’s have a look at the description jwt.io provides on when to use JWTs: Authorization: This is the most common scenario for using JWT. Once … Read more
Due to its nature the AuthoriseAttribute looks like it is called in the pipeline before the model binders and parameter bindings have run. You also run into issues when you access the Request.Content and read from it… this can only be done once and if you are going to try it in your auth attribute … Read more
There is actually a third approach. The asp.net membership functionality is based on the provider model. You can write a custom provider, thus being able to provide your own implementation for how the data is stored, but retaining much of the benefit of asp.net membership. Some articles on the subject: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f1kyba5e.aspx http://www.asp.net/learn/videos/video-189.aspx http://www.15seconds.com/issue/050216.htm http://davidhayden.com/blog/dave/archive/2007/10/11/CreateCustomMembershipProviderASPNETWebsiteSecurity.aspx
Hidden – This is the best approach for actions that are never available to the current user. There is no point in having the user waste mental effort figuring out why something is disabled if there is no action they can take to change this. Disabled – This is the best approach for actions that … Read more
Note: The answer addresses the general case where an external authorization system is to be integrated with the JVM, by means of the standard security framework. It is not Shiro- or JMX-specific, as I am familiar with neither. Conceptually, it appears that you are after the policy decision point (PDP) — the facility where authorization … Read more
Web.config-based security should almost never be used in an MVC application. The reason for this is that multiple URLs can potentially hit a controller, and putting these checks in Web.config invariably misses something. Remember – controllers are not associated with areas, routes are associated with areas. The MVC controller factory will happily serve controllers from … Read more
Updated solution for React router v4 <Route path=”/some-path” render={() => !isAuthenticated ? <Login/> : <Redirect to=”/some-path” /> }/> React router up to v3 Use ‘onEnter’ event and in callback check if the user is authorized: <Route path=”https://stackoverflow.com/” component={App} onEnter={someAuthCheck}> const someAuthCheck = (nextState, transition) => { … }
To get headers from the request you should use the Request class public function yourControllerFunction(\Illuminate\Http\Request $request) { $header = $request->header(‘Authorization’); // do some stuff } See https://laravel.com/api/5.5/Illuminate/Http/Request.html#method_header