No, you’re doing the right thing.
Here’s a snippet of my protocol buffer (details omitted for brevity):
message DemandSummary
{
required uint32 solutionIndex = 1;
required uint32 demandID = 2;
}
message ComputeResponse
{
repeated DemandSummary solutionInfo = 3;
}
…and the C++ to fill up ComputeResponse::solutionInfo:
ComputeResponse response;
for ( int i = 0; i < demList.size(); ++i ) {
DemandSummary* summary = response.add_solutioninfo();
summary->set_solutionindex(solutionID);
summary->set_demandid(demList[i].toUInt());
}
response.solutionInfo now contains demList.size() elements.