TL, DR: There is no difference and they can be used interchangeably.
Besides having the same value as math.inf and float('inf'):
>>> import math
>>> import numpy as np
>>> np.inf == float('inf')
True
>>> np.inf == math.inf
True
It also has the same type:
>>> import numpy as np
>>> type(np.inf)
float
>>> type(np.inf) is type(float('inf'))
float
That’s interesting because NumPy also has it’s own floating point types:
>>> np.float32(np.inf)
inf
>>> type(np.float32(np.inf))
numpy.float32
>>> np.float32('inf') == np.inf # nevertheless equal
True
So it has the same value and the same type as math.inf and float('inf') which means it’s interchangeable.
Reasons for using np.inf
- It’s less to type:
np.inf(6 chars)math.inf(8 chars; new in python 3.5)float('inf')(12 chars)
That means if you already have NumPy imported you can save yourself 6 (or 2) chars per occurrence compared to float('inf') (or math.inf).
- Because it’s easier to remember.
At least for me, it’s far easier to remember np.inf than that I need to call float with a string.
Also, NumPy defines some additional aliases for infinity:
np.Inf
np.inf
np.infty
np.Infinity
np.PINF
It also defines an alias for negative infinity:
np.NINF
Similarly for nan:
np.nan
np.NaN
np.NAN
- Constants are constants
This point is based on CPython and could be completely different in another Python implementation.
A float CPython instance requires 24 Bytes:
>>> import sys
>>> sys.getsizeof(np.inf)
24
If you can re-use the same instance you might save a lot of memory compared to creating lots of new instances. Of course, this point is mute if you create your own inf constant but if you don’t then:
a = [np.inf for _ in range(1000000)]
b = [float('inf') for _ in range(1000000)]
b would use 24 * 1000000 Bytes (~23 MB) more memory than a.
-
Accessing a constant is faster than creating the variable.
%timeit np.inf 37.9 ns ± 0.692 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000000 loops each) %timeit float('inf') 232 ns ± 13.9 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000000 loops each) %timeit [np.inf for _ in range(10000)] 552 µs ± 15.4 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000 loops each) %timeit [float('inf') for _ in range(10000)] 2.59 ms ± 78.7 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Of course, you can create your own constant to counter that point. But why bother if NumPy already did that for you.