There’s a problem with how std::pair
is defined. I’d even say it’s a minor defect in the standard.
It has two constructors that could be used here:
-
pair(const T1 &x, const T2 &y);
, whereT1
,T2
are template parameters of thepair
. -
template <class U1, class U2> pair(U1 &&x, U2 &&y);
If you do std::pair<A, A> a{A{}, A{}});
, then the second constructor is selected and all is well.
But if you do std::pair<A, A> a{{}, {}};
, the compiler can’t use the second constructor because it can’t deduce U1
, U2
, because {}
by itself has no type. So the first constructor is used and you get a copy.
For it to work properly, std::pair
should have an extra non-template constructor pair(T1 &&, T2 &&)
, and for a good measure two extra constructors: pair(const T1 &, T2 &&)
and pair(T1 &&, const T2 &)
.