What performance increases can we expect as the Perl 6 implementations mature?

by

Another thing you have to understand about the lack of optimization is that it’s compounded. A large portion of Rakudo is written in Perl 6. So for example the [+] operator is implemented by the method Any.reduce (called with $expression set to &infix:<+>), which has as its inner loop

for @.list {
    @args.push($_);
    if (@args == $arity) {
        my $res = $expression.(@args[0], @args[1]);
        @args = ($res);
    }
}

in other words, a pure-perl implementation of reduce, which itself is being run by Rakudo. So not only is the code you can see not getting optimized, the code that you don’t see that’s making your code run is also not getting
optimized. Even instances of the + operator are actually method calls, since although the + operator on Num is implemented by Parrot, there’s nothing yet in Rakudo to recognize that you’ve got two Nums and optimize away the method call, so there’s a full dynamic dispatch before Rakudo finds multi sub infix:<+>(Num $a, Num $b) and realizes that all it’s really doing is an ‘add’ opcode. It’s a reasonable excuse for being 100-1000x slower than Perl 5 🙂

Update 8/23/2010

More information from Jonathan Worthington on the kinds of changes that need to happen with the Perl 6 object model (or at least Rakudo’s conception of it) to make things fast while retaining Perl 6’s “everything is method calls” nature.

Update 1/10/2019

Since I can see that this is still getting attention… over the years, Rakudo/MoarVM have gotten JIT, inlining, dynamic specialization, and tons of work by many people optimizing every part of the system. The result is that most of those method calls can be “compiled out” and have nearly zero runtime cost. Perl 6 scores hundreds or thousands of times faster on many benchmarks than it did in 2010, and in some cases it’s faster than Perl 5.

In the case of the sum-to-100,000 problem that the question started with, Rakudo 2018.06 is still a bit slower than perl 5.26.2:

$ time perl -e 'use List::Util 'sum'; print sum(1 .. 100000), "\n";' >/dev/null

real    0m0.023s
user    0m0.015s
sys     0m0.008s

$ time perl6 -e 'say [+] 1 .. 100000;' >/dev/null

real    0m0.089s
user    0m0.107s
sys     0m0.022s

But if we amortize out startup cost by running the code 10,000 times, we see a different story:

$ time perl -e 'use List::Util 'sum'; for (1 .. 10000) { print sum(1 .. 100000), "\n"; }' > /dev/null

real    0m16.320s
user    0m16.317s
sys     0m0.004s

$ time perl6 -e 'for 1 .. 10000 { say [+] 1 .. 100000; }' >/dev/null

real    0m0.214s
user    0m0.245s
sys     0m0.021s

perl6 uses a few hundred more milliseconds than perl5 on startup and compilation, but then it figures out how to do the actual summation around 70 times faster.

Leave a Comment

tech