Rob – I have used JScript.NET in anger in one place in my code, which is essentially to expose the functionality of its eval method. Here is a cut-down version:
static public class Evaluator
{
private const string _jscriptSource =
@"package Evaluator
{
class Evaluator
{
public function Eval(expr : String) : String
{
return eval(expr);
}
}
}";
static private object _evaluator;
static private Type _evaluatorType;
static Evaluator()
{
InstantiateInternalEvaluator();
}
static private void InstantiateInternalEvaluator()
{
JScriptCodeProvider compiler = new JScriptCodeProvider();
CompilerParameters parameters;
parameters = new CompilerParameters();
parameters.GenerateInMemory = true;
CompilerResults results;
results = compiler.CompileAssemblyFromSource(parameters, _jscriptSource);
Assembly assembly = results.CompiledAssembly;
_evaluatorType = assembly.GetType("Evaluator.Evaluator");
_evaluator = Activator.CreateInstance(_evaluatorType);
}
static public object EvaluateToObject(string statement)
{
try
{
return _evaluatorType.InvokeMember(
"Eval",
BindingFlags.InvokeMethod,
null,
_evaluator,
new object[] {statement}
);
}
catch (Exception)
{
InstantiateInternalEvaluator();
return null;
}
}
You can obviously create overloads for other return types. I can’t claim the original idea for this was mine! Uses for this would be, for example, to evaluate a string expression like 3 + 4 to 7 without expression parsing.