Are functors actually faster than pointers to functions?

The C++ and C standards leaves a bunch of freedom to compilers. Compilers are free to count to 1 billion between every instruction, or only do so if an integer has a prime value in it. Decent “real” compilers don’t do this. This is a quality of implementation issue. Inlining function objects into something like … Read more

Function pointer as parameter

The correct way to do this is: typedef void (*callback_function)(void); // type for conciseness callback_function disconnectFunc; // variable to store function pointer type void D::setDisconnectFunc(callback_function pFunc) { disconnectFunc = pFunc; // store } void D::disconnected() { disconnectFunc(); // call connected = false; }

How to get function’s name from function’s pointer in Linux kernel?

I’m surprised why everybody says it is not possible. It is possible on Linux for non-static functions. I know at least two ways to achieve this. There are GNU functions for backtrace printing: backtrace() and backtrace_symbols() (See man). In your case you don’t need backtrace() as you already have function pointer, you just pass it … Read more

What’s the syntax for declaring an array of function pointers without using a separate typedef?

arr //arr arr [] //is an array (so index it) * arr [] //of pointers (so dereference them) (* arr [])() //to functions taking nothing (so call them with ()) void (* arr [])() //returning void so your answer is void (* arr [])() = {}; But naturally, this is a bad practice, just use … Read more

Complex C declaration

I haven’t done this in a while! Start with foo and go right. float * (*(*foo())[SIZE][SIZE])() foo is a function with no arguments… Can’t go right since there’s a closing parenthesis. Go left: float * (*(* foo())[SIZE][SIZE])() foo is a function with no arguments returning a pointer Can’t go left further, so let’s cross the … Read more

Returning function pointer type

int (*getFunc())(int, int) { … } That provides the declaration you requested. Additionally, as ola1olsson notes, it would be good to insert void: int (*getFunc(void))(int, int) { … } This says that getFunc may not take any parameters, which can help avoid errors such as somebody inadvertently writing getFunc(x, y) instead of getFunc()(x, y).

Hata!: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'divattrend_liink'@'localhost' (using password: YES)