Depending on why you want to do this, you might be better off using the built-in TeX support for hanging indentation, which the hanging package sugars. If it’s a one-off, use the package, but if it’s built in to some other layout, the package might just confuse things. Up to you. The \hangindent dimension gives … Read more
latexmk -c will remove the unnecessary files. latexmk is a great way to manage the compile too!
The problem is the columns=flexible option. Remove it and it looks like you want it to look. At least, if there is no actual reason for you to use it. If there is, there is no way to have the monospaceness of your snippet to look like in Xcode :).
I just had this problem… breaklines worked for me, though you do need to set it to true – the default is false: \lstinputlisting[style=Python, caption=My Class, label={mine.py}, breaklines=true, ]{../python/mine.py} is pretty much what I used
Try the following test: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{xifthen}% provides \isempty test \newcommand{\optarg}[1][]{% \ifthenelse{\isempty{#1}}% {}% if #1 is empty {(((#1)))}% if #1 is not empty } \begin{document} Testing \verb|\optarg|: \optarg% prints nothing Testing \verb|\optarg[]|: \optarg[]% prints nothing Testing \verb|\optarg[test]|: \optarg[test]% prints (((test))) \end{document} The xifthen package provides the \ifthenelse construct and the \isempty test. Another option is to … Read more
Earlier I used macros for “et al.”, etc., but nowadays I would discourage people from defining that kind of macros. One problem is what you already observed: it’s surprisingly tricky to get the definitions right so that they handle all special cases correctly (including the interactions with other packages – e.g., those that re-define the … Read more
This is a simple solution that requires no additional packages, just one additional label: \begin{subequations} \label{eq1} \begin{align} a & = b \label{eq11} \\ c & = d \label{eq12} \end{align} \end{subequations} And when you do \eqref{eq1} it will display as (1).
Use \fullcite with the biblatex package as mentioned in this answer on tex.stackexchange.
I had the same problem. Anyhow, here the “simple” solution (put it in your preamble): \let\tmp\oddsidemargin \let\oddsidemargin\evensidemargin \let\evensidemargin\tmp \reversemarginpar Cheers, Chris Edit: Contrary to the previous solutions, the provided code does not change the style of the document 🙂
I found the answer I was looking for. The thing to use here is the construct of \left \middle \right For example, in this case, two possible solutions are: $\left( {\frac{a_1}{a_2}} \middle/ {\frac{b_1}{b_2}} \right) $ Or, in case the brackets are not necessary: $\left. {\frac{a_1}{a_2}} \middle/ {\frac{b_1}{b_2}} \right. $