Macro expansion is a complex process that is really only understandable by understanding the steps that occur.
-
When a macro with arguments is recognized (macro name token followed by
(token), the following tokens up to the matching)are scanned and split (on,tokens). No macro expansion happens while this is happening (so the,s and)must be present in the input stream directly and cannot be in other macros). -
Each macro argument whose name appears in the macro body not preceeded by
#or##or followed by##is “prescanned” for macros to expand — any macros entirely within the argument will be recursively expanded before substituting into the macro body. -
The resulting macro argument token streams are substituted into the body of the macro. Arguments involved in
#or##operations are modified (stringized or pasted) and substituted based on the original parser tokens from step 1 (step 2 does not occur for these). -
The resulting macro body token stream is scanned again for macros to expand, but ignoring the macro currently being expanded1. At this point further tokens in the input (after what was scanned and parsed in step 1) may be included as part of any macros recognized.
The important thing is that there are TWO DIFFERENT recursive expansions that occur (step 2 and step 4 above) and ONLY the one in step 4 ignores recursive macro expansions of the same macro. The recursive expansion in step 2 DOES NOT ignore the current macro, so can expand it recursively.
So for your example above, lets see what happens. For the input
EXPAND(TEST PARENTHESIS())
- step 1 sees the macro
EXPANDand scans in argument listTEST PARENTHESIS()forX - step 2 does not recognize
TESTas a macro (no following(), but does recognizePARENTHESIS:- step 1 (nested) gets an empty token sequence for the argument
- step 2 scans that empty sequence and does nothing
- step 3 inserts into the macro body
()yielding just that:() - step 4 scans
()for macros and doesn’t find any
- so the final value for
Xafter step 2 isTEST () - step 3 inserts that into the body, giving
TEST () - step 4 suppresses
EXPANDand scans the result of step 3 for more macros, findingTEST- step 1 gets an empty sequence for the argument
- step 2 does nothing
- step 3 substitutes into the body giving
EXPAND(0) - step 4 recursive expands that, suppressing
TEST. At this point, bothEXPANDandTESTare suppressed (due to being in the step 4 expansion), so nothing happens
Your other example EXPAND(TEST()) is different
- step 1
EXPANDis recognized as a macro, andTEST()is parsed as the argumentX - step 2, this stream is recursively parsed. Note that since this is step 2,
EXPANDis NOT SUPPRESSED- step 1
TESTis recognized as a macro with an empty sequence argument - step 2 — nothing (no macros in an empty token sequence)
- step 3, substituted into the body giving
EXPAND(0) - step 4,
TESTis suppressed and the result recursively expanded- step 1,
EXPANDis recognized as a macro (remember, at this point onlyTESTis suppressed by step 4 recursion —EXPANDis in the step 2 recursion so is not suppressed) with0as its argument - step 2,
0is scanned and nothing happens to it - step 3, substitute into the body giving
0 - step 4,
0is scanned again for macros (and again nothing happens)
- step 1,
- step 1
- step 3, the
0is substituted as the argumentXinto the body of the firstEXPAND - step 4,
0is scanned again for macros (and again nothing happens)
so the final result here is 0
1Exactly how this happens appears to vary between implementations. Some implementations will merely not expand the macro at this point, but might expand it later if a subsequent rescan for another macro sees it again. Other implementations will ‘mark’ the token internally so that they don’t expand the macro even with subsequent rescans. Either method can be seen as conforming to the spec, which is unclear on this detail