Is it a good way to use java.util.concurrent.FutureTask?

You’d be better off using the get() method.

futureOne.get();
futureTwo.get();

Both of which wait for notification from the thread that it finished processing, this saves you the busy-wait-with-timer you are now using which is not efficient nor elegant.

As a bonus, you have the API get(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) which allows you to define a maximum time for the thread to sleep and wait for a response, and otherwise continues running.

See the Java API for more info.

Leave a Comment

Hata!: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'divattrend_liink'@'localhost' (using password: YES)