You could use get twice:
example_dict.get('key1', {}).get('key2')
This will return None if either key1 or key2 does not exist.
Note that this could still raise an AttributeError if example_dict['key1'] exists but is not a dict (or a dict-like object with a get method). The try..except code you posted would raise a TypeError instead if example_dict['key1'] is unsubscriptable.
Another difference is that the try...except short-circuits immediately after the first missing key. The chain of get calls does not.
If you wish to preserve the syntax, example_dict['key1']['key2'] but do not want it to ever raise KeyErrors, then you could use the Hasher recipe:
class Hasher(dict):
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/3405143/190597
def __missing__(self, key):
value = self[key] = type(self)()
return value
example_dict = Hasher()
print(example_dict['key1'])
# {}
print(example_dict['key1']['key2'])
# {}
print(type(example_dict['key1']['key2']))
# <class '__main__.Hasher'>
Note that this returns an empty Hasher when a key is missing.
Since Hasher is a subclass of dict you can use a Hasher in much the same way you could use a dict. All the same methods and syntax is available, Hashers just treat missing keys differently.
You can convert a regular dict into a Hasher like this:
hasher = Hasher(example_dict)
and convert a Hasher to a regular dict just as easily:
regular_dict = dict(hasher)
Another alternative is to hide the ugliness in a helper function:
def safeget(dct, *keys):
for key in keys:
try:
dct = dct[key]
except KeyError:
return None
return dct
So the rest of your code can stay relatively readable:
safeget(example_dict, 'key1', 'key2')