This is one possible way to define an XSD matching your XML; when learning XSD, you could enroll the help of a tool that infers the XSD for you, starting from one or more XML sample files.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--W3C Schema generated by QTAssistant/W3C Schema Refactoring Module (http://www.paschidev.com)-->
<xsd:schema attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xsd:element name="component">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="operation">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="input">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:attribute name="type" type="xsd:string" use="required" />
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute name="name" type="xsd:string" use="required" />
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="event">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="output">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:attribute name="type" type="xsd:string" use="required" />
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute name="name" type="xsd:string" use="required" />
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute name="type" type="xsd:string" use="required" />
<xsd:attribute name="binding" type="xsd:string" use="required" />
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
As you walkthrough this, you may start tweaking min/maxOccurs, use (required/optional), reusing definitions, etc. A generated XSD is a good starting point, but typically ends up being edited one way or another…