Relationship between !important and CSS specificity

Specificity in CSS only concerns selectors, not their associated declarations. !important applies to a declaration, so it alone plays no role in specificity. However, !important influences the cascade, which is the overall calculation of styles for a certain element when more than one of the same property declaration applies to it. Or, as Christopher Altman … Read more

Change icon-bar (☰) color in bootstrap

The reason your CSS isn’t working is because of specificity. The Bootstrap selector has a higher specificity than yours, so your style is completely ignored. Bootstrap styles this with the selector: .navbar-default .navbar-toggle .icon-bar. This selector has a B specificity value of 3, whereas yours only has a B specificity value of 1. Therefore, to … Read more

Can I override inline !important?

Let me begin by saying that generally inline styles can be overridden: .override {color:red !important;} <p style=”color:blue;”>I will be blue</p> <p style=”color:blue;” class=”override”>But I will be red</p> This behavior is described in W3 specs, where it is stated that !important declarations do not alter the specificity, but rather take precedence over “normal” declarations. That being … Read more

What are the implications of using “!important” in CSS? [duplicate]

Yes, I’d say your example of using !important is bad practice, and it’s very likely it would cause undesired effects further down the line. That doesn’t mean it’s never okay to use though. What’s wrong with !important: Specificity is one of the main forces at work when the browser decides how CSS affects the page. … Read more

Hata!: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'divattrend_liink'@'localhost' (using password: YES)