What’s the relationship between profunctors and arrows?

What profunctors lack compared to arrows is the ability to compose them. If we add composition, will we get an arrow? MONOIDS This is exactly the question tackled in section 6 of “Notions of Computation as Monoids,” which unpacks a result from the (rather dense) “Categorical semantics for arrows”. “Notions” is a great paper because … Read more

Understanding Arrows in Haskell

Please take a look in http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/hudak/CS429F04/AFPLectureNotes.pdf, which explains how Arrows work in FRP. 2-tuples are used in defining Arrows because it’s needed to represent an arrowized function taking 2 arguments. In FRP, constants and variables are often represented as arrows which ignores its “input”, e.g. twelve, eleven :: Arrow f => f p Int twelve … Read more

Monads vs. Arrows

There are two excellent papers by Lindley, Wadler & Yallop (discussed at LTU here). The most important thing to understand is that there are more things which are arrows than there are things which are monads. Conversely, monads are strictly more powerful than arrows (the second paper above specifies precisely in which fashion). In particular, … Read more

techhipbettruvabetnorabahisbahis forumu