$last is the truthy value.. so it holds either true or false and it doesn’t hold the last element index.. I guess below expression should solve your problem <p><span ng-repeat=”user in Users”> {{user.Username}} {{$last ? ” : ($index==Users.length-2) ? ‘ and ‘ : ‘, ‘}} </span></p> Also make sure that you have the expression with … Read more
You can do something like <div ng-app=”test-app” ng-controller=”MyController”> <ul id=”contents”> <li ng-repeat=”content in contents”> <div class=”title”>{{$index}} – {{content.title}} – {{contents[$index – 1]}}</div> </li> </ul> </div> JS var app = angular.module(‘test-app’, []); app.controller(‘MyController’, function($scope){ $scope.contents=[{ title: ‘First’ }, { title: ‘Second’ }, { title: ‘Third’ }] }) Demo: Fiddle Be careful: $index is for the directive … Read more
It’s because angularJS automatically trimmed your model. If you’re using angularJS 1.1.1 or newer, add ng-trim=”false” to textarea. Working example: http://jsfiddle.net/9DbYY/
Change the orderBy filter to this: orderBy:[‘-status’,’name’] This will order by descending status (by prefixing the – character), then ascending name. Currently you’re passing true to reverse the sort, which is causing the status to be correct (online first), but the names to be reversed (i.e., descending). If you want to keep the reverse boolean, … Read more
You can use: <div ng-repeat=”item in items | filter:{visible: true} | limitTo: 50″> <p>{{item.id}}</p> </div> filter:{visible: true} will return a list of all visible items You can take a look at the angularjs docu for more information on the filter filter. http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.filter:filter
While you would see this in the thread the author’s answer references in a link, I thought it would be good to put up one of the mentioned workarounds up on SO: It is true that this is technically not implemented, but there is an easy work around if you’re willing to change your data … Read more
Passing an entire object with attribute will not work, you have to use dual way binding. Just change binding from @ to = and modify the HTML below to make it work: changes to directive code: // … scope: { listcolumns: “=” }, // … changes to template: <div linkedlist listcolumns=”cashAccountsColumns”></div>
<div ng-controller=”DynamicCtrl”> <input type=”radio” ng-model=”$parent.lunch” ng-repeat=”m in meat” ng-value=”m” name=”lunch”> {{lunch}} </div> Should do the trick. As I understand it, ng-repeat creates its own $scope. so you need to refer to the $parent $scope; Yes, AngularJS is tricky. Also you need to change the value to ng-value too.
It should be <div ng-repeat=”item in items”> <div ng-class=”{in:$first}” > {{item.title}}</div> </div> Look at ng-class directive in http://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng.directive:ngClass and in this thread What is the best way to conditionally apply a class?
No need to code anything, angular has done this with the existing built-in limitTo filter. Just use a negative limit. From the docs for the limit argument: The length of the returned array or string. If the limit number is positive, limit number of items from the beginning of the source array/string are copied. If … Read more