How is Guava Splitter.onPattern(..).split() different from String.split(..)?

You found a bug!

System.out.println(s.split("abc82")); // [abc, 8]
System.out.println(s.split("abc8"));  // [abc]

This is the method that Splitter uses to actually split Strings (Splitter.SplittingIterator::computeNext):

@Override
protected String computeNext() {
  /*
   * The returned string will be from the end of the last match to the
   * beginning of the next one. nextStart is the start position of the
   * returned substring, while offset is the place to start looking for a
   * separator.
   */
  int nextStart = offset;
  while (offset != -1) {
    int start = nextStart;
    int end;

    int separatorPosition = separatorStart(offset);

    if (separatorPosition == -1) {
      end = toSplit.length();
      offset = -1;
    } else {
      end = separatorPosition;
      offset = separatorEnd(separatorPosition);
    }

    if (offset == nextStart) {
      /*
       * This occurs when some pattern has an empty match, even if it
       * doesn't match the empty string -- for example, if it requires
       * lookahead or the like. The offset must be increased to look for
       * separators beyond this point, without changing the start position
       * of the next returned substring -- so nextStart stays the same.
       */
      offset++;
      if (offset >= toSplit.length()) {
        offset = -1;
      }
      continue;
    }

    while (start < end && trimmer.matches(toSplit.charAt(start))) {
      start++;
    }
    while (end > start && trimmer.matches(toSplit.charAt(end - 1))) {
      end--;
    }

    if (omitEmptyStrings && start == end) {
      // Don't include the (unused) separator in next split string.
      nextStart = offset;
      continue;
    }

    if (limit == 1) {
      // The limit has been reached, return the rest of the string as the
      // final item.  This is tested after empty string removal so that
      // empty strings do not count towards the limit.
      end = toSplit.length();
      offset = -1;
      // Since we may have changed the end, we need to trim it again.
      while (end > start && trimmer.matches(toSplit.charAt(end - 1))) {
        end--;
      }
    } else {
      limit--;
    }

    return toSplit.subSequence(start, end).toString();
  }
  return endOfData();
}

The area of interest is:

if (offset == nextStart) {
  /*
   * This occurs when some pattern has an empty match, even if it
   * doesn't match the empty string -- for example, if it requires
   * lookahead or the like. The offset must be increased to look for
   * separators beyond this point, without changing the start position
   * of the next returned substring -- so nextStart stays the same.
   */
  offset++;
  if (offset >= toSplit.length()) {
    offset = -1;
  }
  continue;
}

This logic works great, unless the empty match happens at the end of a String. If the empty match does occur at the end of a String, it will end up skipping that character. What this part should look like is (notice >= -> >):

if (offset == nextStart) {
  /*
   * This occurs when some pattern has an empty match, even if it
   * doesn't match the empty string -- for example, if it requires
   * lookahead or the like. The offset must be increased to look for
   * separators beyond this point, without changing the start position
   * of the next returned substring -- so nextStart stays the same.
   */
  offset++;
  if (offset > toSplit.length()) {
    offset = -1;
  }
  continue;
}