Laravel: Difference App::bind and App::singleton

It’s exactly like that.

A very simple proof is to test out the behavior. Since the Laravel Application simply extends Illuminate\Container\Container, we’ll use just the container (in my case I even only added the container as a dependency to my composer.json) to test.

require __DIR__ . '/vendor/autoload.php';

class FirstClass
{
    public $value;
}

class SecondClass
{
    public $value;
}

// Test bind()
$container = new Illuminate\Container\Container();

$container->bind('FirstClass');

$instance = $container->make('FirstClass');
$instance->value="test";

$instance2 = $container->make('FirstClass');
$instance2->value="test2";

echo "Bind: $instance->value vs. $instance2->value\n";

// Test singleton()
$container->singleton('SecondClass');

$instance = $container->make('SecondClass');
$instance->value="test";

$instance2 = $container->make('SecondClass');
$instance2->value="test2"; // <--- also changes $instance->value

echo "Singleton: $instance->value vs. $instance2->value\n";

The result is as expected:

Bind: test vs. test2

Singleton: test2 vs. test2

Might be a dirty proof, but indeed it is one.

All the magic lies in the Container::make method.
If the binding is registered as shared (which means as singleton), the class instance is returned, otherwise a new instance every time.

Source: https://github.com/laravel/framework/blob/4.2/src/Illuminate/Container/Container.php#L442

BTW, Container::singleton is the same as Container::bind with the third parameter set to true.

Leave a Comment

Hata!: SQLSTATE[HY000] [1045] Access denied for user 'divattrend_liink'@'localhost' (using password: YES)