“Yes”, but it won’t do what you expect.
The expression used for the switch is evaluated once – in this case contains
evaluates to true/false as the result (e.g. switch(true)
or switch(false)
)
, not a string that can be matched in a case.
As such, the above approach won’t work. Unless this pattern is much larger/extensible, just use simple if/else-if statements.
var loc = ..
if (loc.contains("google")) {
..
} else if (loc.contains("yahoo")) {
..
} else {
..
}
However, consider if there was a classify
function that returned “google” or “yahoo”, etc, perhaps using conditionals as above. Then it could be used as so, but is likely overkill in this case.
switch (classify(loc)) {
case "google": ..
case "yahoo": ..
..
}
While the above discusses such in JavaScript, Ruby and Scala (and likely others) provide mechanisms to handle some more “advanced switch” usage.